Google Analytics is really several products wearing one name: a traffic counter, an event and conversion model, and a bridge into Google's advertising stack. Which of those you depend on decides your replacement. If you mostly want to know how many people visited and where they came from, a lightweight, cookie-free tracker like Umami or Plausible covers it and retires the consent banner at once. If you live in events, funnels, and retention, a product-analytics tool such as PostHog fits better, while Matomo sits closest to Google Analytics' full report set for a near like-for-like dashboard.
Expect the numbers to move and some ecosystem convenience to disappear. Session rules, bot filtering, ad-blocker behavior, consent handling, and time-zone logic all differ, so daily totals will not match Google Analytics exactly; the useful comparison is trend direction, not identical counts. You also give up modeled conversions, audience sync, and the advertising-attribution workflow that came from living inside Google's stack. In return you get exact rather than sampled totals and direct access to the raw data, and several of these tools, including Umami, Plausible, and GoatCounter, measure visits without cookies at all, which removes the banner instead of managing it.
Treat the move as an export-and-re-instrument project, not a data transfer. Pull historical reports from the Google Analytics interface or API, plus a warehouse export if your property already sends data there, but accept that this history becomes reference data in dashboards rather than native history in the new tool. Recreate your events, conversions, custom dimensions, UTM handling, and internal-traffic filters before cutover, then run both systems in parallel long enough to compare trends. Cleanup usually takes longer than the install, because old tags, duplicate events, and inconsistent naming are what distort the new baseline.