8 Best Open Source Alternatives to TeamViewer

Updated July 2026

TeamViewer made remote access feel trivial: install it on both ends and you're driving someone's desktop through almost any firewall, no networking knowledge required. For one-off support that convenience is hard to argue with. The reasons people leave tend to be the same two - cost and trust. Licensing has a reputation for getting expensive and for flagging ordinary personal use as commercial, and the entire session routes through TeamViewer's own relay servers, which is precisely the dependency a security-minded team doesn't want sitting between their admins and their machines.

The open source alternative below takes a different shape: a self-hosted gateway you reach from a plain browser, brokering RDP, VNC, and SSH to the machines behind it. There's no agent to license on every endpoint and no third-party relay in the path - the access server runs on your own infrastructure, so the only thing standing between a user and a remote session is software you host and control.

RustDesk logo

1.RustDesk

116.2kAGPL-3.0Rust Self-host
RustDesk screenshot

RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application for accessing and controlling machines across Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android. Designed as an alternative to TeamViewer, it works out of the box with no configuration required and gives you full control of your data.

  • Remote desktop access and control
  • Peer connections with direct or relayed routing
  • Audio, clipboard, input, and video handling
  • File copy and paste between systems
JumpServer logo

2.JumpServer

30.6kGPL-3.0Python Self-host
JumpServer screenshot

JumpServer is an open-source Privileged Access Management platform and bastion host for DevOps and IT teams. It provides on-demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, database, and RemoteApp endpoints from a web browser, centralizing privileged endpoint access in one web interface.

  • Browser access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, database, and RemoteApp endpoints
  • Privileged access management for DevOps and IT teams
  • Operations management and security control across multiple components
  • Quickstart install for a clean Linux server
Teleport logo

3.Teleport

20.5kAGPL-3.0Go Self-host
Teleport screenshot

Teleport is an infrastructure access platform for connectivity, authentication, access controls, and audit. It provides one identity and access layer for cloud and on-prem infrastructure, covering human users and workloads. It protects SSH servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, Windows desktops, web apps, cloud APIs, Git repositories, and MCP servers without long-lived keys or passwords.

  • SSO for cloud and on-prem infrastructure
  • Short-lived certificate auth without shared SSH keys
  • Access to SSH, Kubernetes, databases, RDP, web apps, and cloud APIs
  • Tunnels to resources behind NATs and firewalls without VPNs
Firezone logo

4.Firezone

8.7kApache-2.0Elixir Self-host
Firezone screenshot

Firezone securely manages remote access for organizations of any size. It takes a least-privileged approach with group-based policies that control access to individual applications, entire subnets, or anything in between. Built on WireGuard, it serves as a replacement for traditional VPN setups.

  • Group-based least-privileged access policies
  • Peer-to-peer, end-to-end encrypted WireGuard tunnels
  • SSO via email, Google Workspace, Okta, Entra ID, or OIDC
  • Automatic user and group directory sync
Boundary logo

5.Boundary

4kOtherGo Self-host
Boundary screenshot

Boundary is an identity-aware proxy for accessing hosts and critical systems on a network. It provides a way to sign in with an IdP, control who can reach resources, and manage privileged sessions without installing software on every host.

  • OpenID Connect sign-in with your IdP
  • Just-in-time network access to resources
  • Native static credential store or Vault-based dynamic credentials
  • Session controls for privileged access
Bastillion logo

6.Bastillion

3.5kOtherJava Self-host
Bastillion screenshot

Bastillion is a web-based SSH console and key management tool for centrally managing administrative access to systems. It acts as a bastion host, giving administrators a browser interface for SSH access instead of connecting to each system directly.

  • Browser-based SSH console for administrative access
  • SSH public key management and distribution
  • 2-factor login with Authy or Google Authenticator
  • Secure web shells with command sharing across sessions
ShellHub logo

7.ShellHub

2kApache-2.0TypeScript Self-host
ShellHub screenshot

ShellHub is a centralized SSH gateway for remotely accessing and managing Linux servers, embedded Linux devices, and IoT devices from anywhere with an internet connection. It removes the need to expose public IP addresses, change router settings, or rely on VPN, firewall changes, or jump hosts.

  • Native SSH access with OpenSSH Client and PuTTY
  • SCP and SFTP file transfer support
  • SSH port forwarding, including SOCKS proxy use
  • Public-key authentication and SSH firewall rules
Apache Guacamole logo

8.Apache Guacamole

1.7kApache-2.0Java Self-host
Apache Guacamole screenshot

Apache Guacamole is an HTML5 web application that provides access to your desktop using remote desktop protocols. It is built to serve as a browser-based client for remote access, so you can connect without installing a native desktop app on the machine you are using.

  • HTML5 browser access to remote desktops
  • Supports the VNC, RDP, and SSH protocols
  • Clientless: no plugins or client software needed
  • Runs under servlet containers like Tomcat or Jetty

Switching from TeamViewer to open source

Start by deciding which part of TeamViewer you are actually replacing. For ad hoc support, the hard requirement is reliable NAT traversal with minimal client setup, because TeamViewer's ID based workflow hides most network problems from the technician. For internal IT, unattended access, device grouping, operator roles, and session logging usually matter more than a fast one-time connection. Also decide whether you want a fully self-hosted broker and relay, a hybrid model, or direct peer connections. That choice affects firewall rules, latency, auditability, and how much operational work your team inherits.

Expect fewer invisible conveniences than TeamViewer provides out of the box. Some open source options have rougher installers, less consistent mobile support, weaker remote printing, or a less polished way to invite a nontechnical user into a session. Hosted relay capacity is another difference: TeamViewer absorbs that infrastructure for you, while a self-hosted replacement makes bandwidth, TLS certificates, DNS, availability, and abuse controls your responsibility. Browser access, unattended wake behavior, multi-monitor handling, and clipboard fidelity should be tested on the actual operating systems you support, not assumed from a feature matrix.

Migration is mostly re-enrollment, not a clean import. Inventory your TeamViewer account first: device groups, saved partner IDs, assigned users, unattended hosts, policies, allowlists, scripts, and any session reports you must retain. TeamViewer IDs, passwords, and account trust relationships do not transfer to another remote access system. Deploy the new host or agent through your endpoint management tool where possible, verify unattended access, then remove TeamViewer from machines only after a fallback window. Export logs or reports needed for compliance before closing accounts, because connection history rarely maps cleanly into a new tool.

Related alternatives

Frequently asked questions

What should replace TeamViewer first in a support workflow?+

Start with the connection model. TeamViewer gives technicians a simple remote ID workflow backed by hosted relays, so the replacement must make first contact just as predictable for the users you support. Test the exact path a customer or employee will follow: download, launch, approve access, elevate privileges if needed, and reconnect after reboot. If that flow is clumsy, the rest of the feature set matters less.

Is a self-hosted alternative practical for remote support outside our network?+

Yes, but only if you plan for relay and broker infrastructure. Most remote support sessions cross NAT, carrier networks, hotel Wi-Fi, and locked-down offices. Direct peer connections will not be enough in many cases. A practical self-hosted setup needs public DNS, TLS, reachable relay services, monitoring, backups, and enough bandwidth for screen updates and file transfers during peak support hours.

How do open source licenses affect commercial use compared with TeamViewer?+

Read the license before deploying, especially if you modify the software, bundle it with a managed service, or expose it to customers. Some licenses are permissive, while others require source availability for modifications or networked use. The software license is separate from your operating cost: hosting, support, endpoint deployment, security review, and staff time can be more important than subscription price when replacing TeamViewer.

Will security get better or worse after leaving TeamViewer?+

It depends on your deployment discipline. TeamViewer centralizes identity, relays, and policy controls in its service. With an open source replacement, you may gain more control over keys, logs, and network placement, but you also own patching, hardening, credential policy, and abuse prevention. Require multi-factor authentication for operators, restrict unattended access, log sessions, and test what happens when an operator account is compromised.

What happens to unattended access already configured in TeamViewer?+

It does not carry over. Unattended access is tied to TeamViewer's installed host, account assignment, device identity, and access policy. You need to deploy the new agent, enroll each machine into the new system, assign permissions, and verify access after reboot. Keep TeamViewer available during a short transition so you can recover machines where the new agent fails to install or cannot reach its relay.

Are mobile devices a realistic replacement target?+

Check this early. Remote viewing and remote control on phones and tablets depend heavily on operating system rules, device management profiles, and vendor permissions. Some open source tools can view mobile screens but have limited control, especially on consumer devices. If your TeamViewer usage includes supporting field phones or tablets, test the exact device models and management state before committing.

Which TeamViewer features are commonly missing or weaker?+

Remote printing, polished customer invitation links, session recording, mobile control, address books, and enterprise policy management are the usual friction points. File transfer and clipboard sync may exist but behave differently across operating systems and privilege levels. Multi-monitor support also varies. Make a short checklist from real TeamViewer sessions and run live tests instead of assuming that a named feature behaves the same way.

How much TeamViewer data can be imported into another tool?+

Usually less than people expect. You can manually recreate users, groups, device names, and permissions, and you may be able to export reports for recordkeeping. TeamViewer partner IDs, trusted devices, unattended passwords, and session relationships are not portable credentials. Treat migration as a rebuild of your remote access inventory, with naming cleanup and permission review included in the project.

How should teams handle technician permissions in the new system?+

Model permissions around support roles, not individual convenience. Separate help desk access from server administration, limit unattended access to the groups that need it, and require stronger authentication for privileged sessions. If the replacement lacks mature role based controls, compensate with network segmentation, separate relay instances, or short-lived access workflows. Do not recreate broad TeamViewer access grants without reviewing who still needs them.

Will performance match TeamViewer over slow links?+

Not automatically. TeamViewer has years of tuning around relays, codecs, bandwidth adaptation, and reconnect behavior. Open source replacements vary widely depending on protocol, relay distance, server capacity, screen resolution, and whether hardware acceleration is used. Test from the networks that cause real tickets: home broadband, cellular hotspots, VPNs, and restricted guest networks. Latency under load matters more than a clean office LAN demo.

Do open source replacements work on a local network without internet?+

Some do, and that can be a major advantage for labs, factories, and isolated environments. Verify whether the tool can discover or connect to hosts by local address without calling an external service. Also test authentication when offline. A system that relies on a central identity provider or public relay may fail in an outage even if both computers are on the same LAN.

What audit logs should replace TeamViewer session records?+

At minimum, capture who connected, which endpoint was accessed, when the session started and ended, whether files were transferred, and whether privileges were elevated. If you need compliance evidence, confirm that logs are tamper resistant enough for your environment and retained for the required period. Session recording is a separate requirement; do not assume connection logs prove what happened during support.

How should backups be planned for a self-hosted remote access server?+

Back up the parts that would block support if lost: server configuration, user and device records, access policies, keys or certificates, and audit logs. Store recovery instructions outside the system, because a remote access outage can prevent administrators from reaching the server they need to fix. Test restoring to a clean host, including DNS and TLS changes, before relying on the backup plan.

What if the open source project slows down or is abandoned?+

Have an exit path before deploying widely. Prefer standard operating system packages, documented configuration, and data you can export or recreate without proprietary tooling. Keep endpoint deployment scripted so you can remove or replace the agent at scale. Watch release history and security issue handling, but also reduce dependency risk by avoiding custom forks that only one person on your team understands.